The R community tinyverse
movement is a tryout of creating a new package development standards.
The clue is the TINY part here. The last years od R package development
were full of high number of dependencies temptations.
tinyverse
means as least dependencies as possible as R
package dependencies matter. Every dependency you add to your project is
an invitation to break your project.
More information is available on tinyverse
website.
tinyverse
badgesThe tidyverse
team want to help and motivate R
developers. Thus they created a rest-api which generates a dependencies
badge for each CRAN package. The badge contains 2 numbers the first
number is a direct dependencies and the second one recursive ones. The R
base packages are not counted. The tinyverse
badge could
have 4 colors bright green or green or orange or red, to get a green
badge package have to have less than 5 packages (<5) in the
Depends
/Imports
/LinkingTo
fields
(check Dependencies subsection for more description). To have a bright
green a zero dependencies are needed. The orange badge is from 5 to 9
dependencies (>=5 and <=9). And the last oen red when there are
more than 9 dependencies (>= 10). Of course the base packages are not
counted as a dependency, pacs::pacs_base()
.
Summing up, each badge constraint:
https://tinyverse.netlify.app/
https://tinyverse.netlify.com/badge/<package>
Examples:
The tidyverse
is an opinionated collection of R packages
designed for data science. All packages share an underlying design
philosophy, grammar, and data structures. On the other hand the
tinyvere
is only a R community movement which try to make a
new programming standard. There is no tinyverse
packages
collection, any package which have less than 5 direct dependencies (in
the Depends
/Imports
/LinkingTo
fields) are treated as a decent one. The best is to have zero
dependencies. Even tidyverse
looks to go in the direction
of tinyverse
if we check their lower level packages like
purrr
, forcats
, renv
or
rlang
.
the core tidyverse
packages:
ggplot2
:
tibble
:
tidyr
:
readr
:
purrr
:
dplyr
:
stringr
:
forcats
:
examples of random tinyverse
packages, bright green or
green badges:
TL;DR
install.packages
requires
Depends/Imports/LinkingTo
DESCRIPTION fields dependencies, recursively.
pacs::pac_deps_user
could be used to get them.R CMD check
requires
Depends/Imports/LinkingTo/Suggests
DESCRIPTION fields dependencies, and for them
Depends/Imports/LinkingTo
fields recursively. pacs::pac_deps_dev
could be used to get
them.Now you might think of what preciously these R package dependencies mean. The R DESCRIPTION file is the place where we could explore the number and nature of dependencies, the 5 fields are representing different types of dependencies: Depends/Imports/LinkingTo/Suggests/Enhances.
DESCRIPTION file dependencies:
Package: NAME
...
Depends:
R (>= 3.6)
Imports:
dplyr
data.table
LinkingTo:
Rcpp
Suggests:
testthat
ca2cat
Enhances:
Hmisc
...
We could get any installed packages description file with the
packageDescription
function. More than that the
pacs::pac_description
could get any even not installed
package description file and for any version you want.
packageDescription("pacs")
When we run install.packages
(and other install
functions like remotes::install_github
) only 3 fields are
installed
Depends/Imports/LinkingTo.
We could easily confirm that by checking its help page and the
dependencies
argument definition:
?install.packages
...
dependencies:
...
The default, ‘NA’,
means ‘c("Depends", "Imports", "LinkingTo")’.
Depends are packages library
(attached), before the main package is library
(attached).
So when we library()
the main package
Depends dependencies functions are available to the end
user in the R console. This could be more convenient for the end user if
the main package is for example offering additional functionality over
the dependency one.
The Imports field lists packages whose namespaces
are imported from (as specified in the NAMESPACE file or when sb is
using ::
/:::
inside the package) but which do
not need to be attached (library
). So when we
library()
the main package such dependencies functions are
not available to the user in the R console. Namespaces accessed by the
::
and :::
operators
(e.g. ggplot2::ggplot
) must be listed in the
Imports field, or in Suggests (when
used only for tests or examples).
A package that wishes to make use of header files in other packages to compile its C/C++ code needs to declare them as a comma-separated list in the field LinkingTo. Specifying a package in LinkingTo suffices if these are C/C++ headers containing source code or static linking is done at installation: the packages do not need to be (and usually should not be) listed in the Depends or Imports fields.
So what about the rest. Suggests are installed when
we run R CMD CHECK
(or higher level like
devtools::check()
), they are used for tests (e.g. testthat)
or for examples (roxygen2
@examples). Enhances is used
rarely as these are packages which could extent the usage and are NOT
needed for running examples and tests. If your tests/examples use e.g. a
dataset from another package it should be in Suggests
and not Enhances.
So now we see that a Imports dependency is not equal
to a Suggests dependency. From the perspective of the
end user we focus on
Depends/Imports/LinkingTo
dependencies which they will downlaod with
install.packages
.
It’s common for packages to be listed in Imports in DESCRIPTION, but
not in NAMESPACE. The DESCRIPTION file Imports field really has nothing
to do with functions imported into the namespace. The DESCRIPTION file
Imports is mainly used by install.packages
. On the other
hand NAMESPACE is a place where we defining what we need to build our
package and what we want to expose to the end users (export). Nowadays
the NAMESPACE file is even more mistearious as it is build automatically
e.g. by roxygen2
package. A package have to be listed in
the Imports in DESCRIPTION file, but not in NAMESPACE
if we will call the dependencies function with ::
in the
main package. This explicit calls to dependencies are preferred.
If you are interested “How-R-Searches-And-Finds-Stuff” I recommend a great blog post which have more than 10 years and still is a one of the most valuable R sources.
tinytest
vs testthat
This subsection will be a subjective view on the difference between
tinytest
and testthat
packages. This is a
great example in my opinion as showing that package could have many
dependencies nevertheless not exposed to the end user (these
dependencies are not installed with install.packages
), as
is in Suggests
field of the DESCRIPTION file.
tinytest
was created to offer similar functionality to
testthat
package nevertheless tinytest
has
zero dependencies. For me tinytest
is an interesting
alternative compared to testthat
nevertheless not so
obvious replacement. I do not care how many dependencies has the
testthat
package as it is located in Suggests
field of DESCRIPTION file. testthat
will not be delayed
loaded with requireNampese
too. This mean that the higher
number of dependencies from the testthat
package is only my
problem (developer one, not the end user) when e.g. I am checking the
package (e.g. with R CMD check
). To be fair how many
additional packages have to be downloaded by a
developer (e.g. for R CMD check
) when comparing
tinytest
and testthat
. When we want to check
these packages directly, I will be adding some code to these packages.
In the case of tinytest
it is zero packages and for
testthat
80 packages now. Please use
pacs::pac_deps_dev("tinytest")
and
pacs::pac_deps_dev("testthat")
calls to confirm that. When
tinytest
and testthat
are in the Suggests field
of another package (e.g. pacs
) which we will be
R CMD check
, then developer need additional 0 packages for
tinytest
and 30 packages for testthat
(pacs::pac_deps_user("testthat")
). Remember that these
dependencies might overlap with other packages and their
dependencies.
Dependencies from the end user perspective:
yagni
(XP) - do not include unnecessary featuresmodularization
- divide your package to a few smaller
and specialized onesOne of the method of reducing number of dependencies (exposed to end users) is to transfer the package from Imports to Suggests and load it in the delayed manner, or not include it at all. So we have to identify package functions which will be used optionally or rarely (are not a core of the package). Then we have to apply conditional execution of it if the package is installed (available), if not then ask user to install it. If a function with such delayed loaded package is used in examples or tests then the package have to be in Suggests field.
func <- function() {
if (requireNamespace("PACKAGE", quietly = TRUE)) {
# regular code
} else {
stop("Please install the PACKAGE to use the func function")
}
}
parsnip
and caret
packages are examples
which apply this strategy. It could be easily confirmed by looking for
requireNamespace
phrase with github search, from each of
the repo.
pacs
packageOne of the functionality of the pacs
package is to check
a package complexity. We could check the number of dependencies
(recursively or not) and even check how many MB are allocated for a
package and all its dependencies.
Weight Case Study: devtools
Take into account that packages sizes are appropriate for your local
system (Sys.info()
). Installation with
install.packages
and some devtools
functions
might result in different packages sizes.
If you do not want to install anything in your current library
(.libPaths()
) and still inspect a package size, then a
usage of the withr
package is recommended.
withr::with_temp_libpaths
is recommended to isolate the
download process.
# restart of R session could be needed
::with_temp_libpaths({install.packages("devtools"); cat(pacs::pac_true_size("devtools") / 10**6, "MB", "\n")}) withr
Installation in your main library.
# if not have
install.packages("devtools")
Size of the devtools
package:
cat(pacs::pac_size("devtools") / 10**6, "MB", "\n")
True size of the package as taking into account its dependencies. At
the time of writing it, it is 113MB
for
devtools
without base packages
(Mac OS arm64
).
cat(pacs::pac_true_size("devtools") / 10**6, "MB", "\n")
A reasonable assumption might be to count only dependencies which are
not used by any other package. Then we could use
exclude_joint
argument to limit them. However hard to
assume if your local installation is a reasonable proxy for an average
user.
# exclude packages if at least one other package use it too
cat(pacs::pac_true_size("devtools", exclude_joint = 1L) / 10**6, "MB", "\n")
It is crucial to check the number of dependencies too:
# 70 recursive dependencies
::pac_deps("devtools", local = TRUE)$Package
pacs# 20 direct dependencies
::pac_deps("devtools", local = TRUE, recursive = FALSE)$Package pacs
We could check out which of the direct dependencies are heaviest ones:
pac_deps_heavy("devtools")
Please read in the order all of the 3 sources to become a R packages developer guru :=)