This package provides some simple tools for examining Rprof output and, in particular, extracting and viewing call graph information. Call graph information, including which direct calls where observed and how much time was spent in these calls, can be very useful in identifying performance bottlenecks.
One important caution: because of lazy evaluation a nested call f(g(x))
will appear on the profile call stack as if g
had been called by f
or one of f
’s callees, because it is the point at which the value of g(x)
is first needed that triggers the evaluation.
The package exports these functions:
readProfileData
reads the data in the file produced by Rprof
into a data structure used by the other functions in the package. The format of the data structure is subject to change.
flatProfile
is similar to summaryRprof
. It returns either a matrix with output analogous to gprof
’s flat profile or a matrix like the by.total
component returned by summaryRprof
; which is returned depends on the value of an optional second argument.
printProfileCallGraph
produces a printed representation of the call graph. It is analogous to the call graph produced by gprof
with a few minor changes. Reading the gprof
manual section on the call graph should help understanding this output. The output is similar enough to gprof output
for the cgprof
(http://mvertes.free.fr/) script to be able to produce a call graph via Graphviz.
profileCallGraph2Dot
prints out a Graphviz .dot
file representing the profile graph. Times spent in calls can be mapped to node and edge colors. The resulting files can then be viewed with the Graphviz command line tools.
plotProfileCallGraph
uses the graph
and Rgraphviz
packages to produce call graph visualizations within R. You will need to install these packages to use this function.
Additional summary functions: funSummary
, callSummary
, pathSummary
, srcSummary
, and hotPaths
.
Additional functions: filterProfileData
, flameGraph
, calleeTreeMap
annotateSource
, and profileExpr
.
The package also exports two variables:
plain.style
google.style
These are style specifications to be used with the call graph display functions plotProfileCallGraph
and profileCallGraph2Dot
.
Collect profile information for the examples for glm
:
Obtain flat profile information:
Obtain hot paths information:
Summaries can be obtained in a similar way:
Obtain a printed call graph on the standard output:
If you have the cgprof script and the Graphviz command line tools available on a UNIX-like system, then you can save the printed graph to a file,
and either use
cgprof -TX glm.graph
to display the graph in the interactive graph viewer dotty
, or use
cgprof -Tps glm.graph > glm.ps
gv glm.ps
to create a PostScript version of the call graph and display it with gv
.
Instead of using the printed graph and cgprof
you can create a Graphviz .dot
file representation of the call graph with
and view the graph interactively with dotty
using
dotty glm.dot
or as a postscript file with
dot -Tps glm.dot > glm.ps
gv glm.ps
You can also write the profile data to a callgrind
file to use with kcachegrind
or qcachegrind
If you have the packages graph
and Rgraphviz
from Bioconductor installed, then you can view the call graph within R using
Both plotProfileCallGraph
and profileCallGraph2Dot
accept many parameters for adjusting features of the display. You can specify these parameters individually or with a single style parameter. For example,
displays the call graph in a style similar to the one used by the pprof
tool in the Google Performance Tools suite.
Similarly, you can plot a flame graph and callee tree map using
Finally, you can filter the profile data by selecting or dropping certain functions. For example,
Now you can use filteredPD
in you calls to summaries functions or plots, for example
My intention was to handle cycles roughly the same way that gprof
does. I am not completely sure that I have managed to do this; I am also not completely sure this is the best approach.
The graphs produced by cgprof
and by plotProfileGraph
and friends when mergeEdges
is false differ a bit. I think this is due to the heuristics of cgprof
not handling cycle entries ideally and that the plotProfileGraph
graphs are actually closer to what is wanted. When mergeEdges
is true the resulting graphs are DAGs, which simplifies interpretation, but at the cost of lumping all cycle members together.
gprof
provides options for pruning graph printouts by omitting specified nodes. It may be useful to allow this here as well.